https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0i5diL3vrEiTkR5UHJiSW9Xekk/edit
The commercial approach celebrity mentions that the BBC
apted for an informal mode of address and young people o front its factual
programmes, Bravo and Sky One have enlisted the help of celebrities to promote
their most successful documentary standard. Nicki Minaj: My Truth is a
three-part special of never-before-seen footage of Nicki Minaj in her personal
and professional life. Part 1 of the trilogy will premiere on E! on Sunday
November 4, 2012 at 10:30pm EST. The following two episodes will air the following
two Sundays (November 11 and November 18, 2012). In the documentary we discover
that The rumor was confirmed by E! on September 28. E! confirmed that the Young
Money rapper is set to appear in three specials on the network beginning in
November.[3] This is hardly the first time Minaj has been the subject of a
special of this nature. Back in 2010, she let MTV cameras into her life for
"My Time Now." On October 28, 2012, a fan asked Nicki on Twitter if
My Truth will be My Time Now on steriods, she replied by saying, "yes
babe". It has been revealed that we will see some studio footage of The Re-Up,
Nicki's house, and her without makeup on. We won't see her real hair though.
The magazine also goes to continue what the genres in documenteries include and how
they have kept up with the audience’s pace of changing and such to fit in the audiences
desires. 1. Poetic documentaries, which first appeared in the 1920’s, were a
sort of reaction against both the content and the rapidly crystallizing grammar
of the early fiction film. The poetic mode moved away from continuity editing
and instead organized images of the material world by means of associations and
patterns, both in terms of time and space. Well-rounded characters—’life-like
people’—were absent; instead, people appeared in these films as entities, just
like any other, that are found in the material world. The films were
fragmentary, impressionistic, lyrical. Their disruption of the coherence of
time and space—a coherence favored by the fiction films of the day—can also be
seen as an element of the modernist counter-model of cinematic narrative. The
‘real world’—Nichols calls it the “historical world”—was broken up into
fragments and aesthetically reconstituted using film form.
Examples: Joris Ivens’ Rain (1928), whose subject is a
passing summer shower over Amsterdam; Laszlo Moholy-Nagy’s Play of Light:
Black, White, Grey (1930), in which he films one of his own kinetic sculptures,
emphasizing not the sculpture itself but the play of light around it; Oskar
Fischinger’s abstract animated films; Francis Thompson’s N.Y., N.Y. (1957), a
city symphony film; Chris Marker’s Sans Soleil (1982).
2. Expository documentaries speak directly to the viewer,
often in the form of an authoritative commentary employing voiceover or titles,
proposing a strong argument and point of view. These films are rhetorical, and
try to persuade the viewer. (They may use a rich and sonorous male voice.) The
(voice-of-God) commentary often sounds ‘objective’ and omniscient. Images are
often not paramount; they exist to advance the argument. The rhetoric
insistently presses upon us to read the images in a certain fashion. Historical
documentaries in this mode deliver an unproblematic and ‘objective’ account and
interpretation of past events.
3. Observational documentaries attempt to simply and
spontaneously observe lived life with a minimum of intervention. Filmmakers who
worked in this sub-genre often saw the poetic mode as too abstract and the
expository mode as too didactic. The first observational docs date back to the
1960’s; the technological developments which made them possible include mobile
lighweight cameras and portable sound recording equipment for synchronized
sound. Often, this mode of film eschewed voice-over commentary,
post-synchronized dialogue and music, or re-enactments. The films aimed for
immediacy, intimacy, and revelation of individual human character in ordinary
life situations.
4. Participatory documentaries believe that it is impossible
for the act of filmmaking to not influence or alter the events being filmed.
What these films do is emulate the approach of the anthropologist:
participant-observation. Not only is the filmmaker part of the film, we also
get a sense of how situations in the film are affected or altered by her
presence. Nichols: “The filmmaker steps out from behind the cloak of voice-over
commentary, steps away from poetic meditation, steps down from a
fly-on-the-wall perch, and becomes a social actor (almost) like any other.
(Almost like any other because the filmmaker retains the camera, and with it, a
certain degree of potential power and control over events.)” The encounter
between filmmaker and subject becomes a critical element of the film. Rouch and
Morin named the approach cinéma vérité, translating Dziga Vertov’s kinopravda
into French; the “truth” refers to the truth of the encounter rather than some
absolute truth.
Examples: Vertov’s The Man with a Movie Camera (1929); Rouch
and Morin’s Chronicle of a Summer (1960); Ross McElwee’s Sherman’s March
(1985); Nick Broomfield’s films. I suspect Michael Moore’s films would also
belong here, although they have a strong ‘expository’ bent as well.
5. Reflexive documentaries don’t see themselves as a transparent
window on the world; instead they draw attention to their own constructedness,
and the fact that they are representations. How does the world get represented
by documentary films? This question is central to this sub-genre of films. They
prompt us to “question the authenticity of documentary in general.” It is the
most self-conscious of all the modes, and is highly skeptical of ‘realism.’ It
may use Brechtian alienation strategies to jar us, in order to ‘defamiliarize’
what we are seeing and how we are seeing it.
6. Performative documentaries stress subjective experience
and emotional response to the world. They are strongly personal,
unconventional, perhaps poetic and/or experimental, and might include
hypothetical enactments of events designed to make us experience what it might
be like for us to possess a certain specific perspective on the world that is
not our own, e.g. that of black, gay men in Marlon Riggs’s Tongues Untied
(1989) or Jenny Livingston’s Paris Is Burning (1991). This sub-genre might also
lend itself to certain groups (e.g. women, ethnic minorities, gays and
lesbians, etc) to ‘speak about themselves.’ Often, a battery of techniques,
many borrowed from fiction or avant-garde films, are used. Performative docs
often link up personal accounts or experiences with larger political or
historical realities.
No comments:
Post a Comment